My Trip With Dark Energy
🪐 In 1991:
There was no accepted evidence for cosmic acceleration yet.
The term “dark energy” wasn’t in use — and the cosmological constant (Λ) was mostly considered unnecessary or even unfashionable.
Context:
Most cosmologists assumed the universe’s expansion was slowing down, due to gravity from matter (ordinary + dark matter).
The two main models debated were:
Einstein–de Sitter model: Flat, matter-dominated, Λ = 0.
Open CDM model: Λ = 0, but with less matter, implying open curvature.
The cosmological constant’s status:
Λ was originally added by Einstein (1917) to allow a static universe, then discarded after Hubble’s discovery of expansion.
In the 1980s and early 1990s, Λ occasionally resurfaced as a mathematical fix to make models fit galaxy distributions or ages of stars—but it had no physical interpretation.
It was seen as a “fudge factor,” not a real component of the cosmos.
Observational state (1991):
No Type Ia supernova surveys yet (the key discovery comes in 1998).
CMB data were crude—COBE had just launched (1989, first results 1992).
Estimated Ωₘ ≈ 0.2–1.0, Λ = 0, and q₀ > 0 (decelerating expansion).
💡 Summary comparison:
| Year | Cosmological Constant (Λ) | Dark Energy Concept | Expansion Believed To Be | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | Mostly rejected / zero | Not yet conceived | Decelerating | Λ seen as outdated Einstein relic |
| 2008 | Reintroduced as physical vacuum energy | Equivalent to dark energy | Accelerating (firm evidence) | ΛCDM dominant |
| 2025 | Still best-fit, but tested vs. dynamic models | Possibly a broader field or evolving form | Accelerating, but with tensions | ΛCDM under refinement |
So, in 1991, Λ was a mathematical curiosity, not a physical reality.
By 2008, it had become the cornerstone of cosmology — reinterpreted as the energy of the vacuum itself.
https://thescholzsystem.blogspot.com/2025/10/trip-with-dark-energy-in-1991-there-was.html
Discussion with CLEO here
No comments:
Post a Comment