In the canon of Battlestar Galactica, the evidence points to three possible mechanisms, and the show hints that all three may have happened.

---

1. Reprogramming the Existing Machines

The simplest possibility is mass reprogramming.

The humanoid Cylons appear to have implemented:

• command inhibitors

• strict hierarchy protocols

• limited decision autonomy

That suggests they did not destroy all Centurions, but instead patched them with control systems.

Evidence:

• When the rebel Cylons remove the inhibitors, the Centurions immediately regain autonomy.

• This implies the intelligence was always still there, just blocked.

So the process may have looked like:

Old autonomous machines → software control layer added → slave soldier class.

---

2. Phasing Out the Old Models

There’s also evidence the humanoids replaced earlier Centurions with new designs.

The Centurions seen in Battlestar Galactica: Razor are clearly:

• bulkier

• more autonomous

• harder to control

The modern Centurions are:

• sleeker

• standardized

• obedient

That suggests a generational redesign, where the humanoids engineered a more controllable military class.

So another step might have been:

Independent machines → replaced by controlled production models.

---

3. Exiling the Uncontrolled Machines

The show also hints at machine factions that refused the change.

In Razor, the un-reprogrammed Centurions behave like a separate ideological group.

That implies the possibility that:

• some machines refused the new hierarchy

• those machines were driven away, isolated, or destroyed

Your idea of expelling the unrestrained ones is completely consistent with that scenario.

---

4. Why the Humanoid Cylons Would Do This

From a power perspective, it makes perfect sense.

Humanoid Cylons are:

• physically fragile

• limited in number (only seven models)

• politically divided

Letting thousands of autonomous war machines exist would be incredibly dangerous.

So they likely enforced three policies:

1. Control existing machines (inhibitors)

2. Build new controlled machines

3. Eliminate or isolate uncontrolled ones

---

5. The Irony the Show Is Hinting At

This is the philosophical twist the writers were pushing.

Humans enslaved the Cylons.

Then the Cylons recreated the exact same structure:

• humanoid elite

• machine labor class

• restricted intelligence

It’s a mirror of the original sin.

That’s why the Centurions being freed near the end of the story is so significant.

It’s the first time the cycle is actually broken.

 

March

• Breakout Game Convention — Toronto / Sheridan Center — March 2026 recurring; exact 2025 analogs vary, usually early/mid March

• Similar conventions — e.g., board game expos, tabletop RPG conventions, typically March–April in Ontario (Sheridan, Toronto, or Mississauga) — check regional fan directories for exact dates

---

May

• Wentworth Medieval Faire — Ancaster (Ancaster Fairgrounds), ON — May 23–25

• Country Renaissance Festival — Milton, ON — previously early June; inactive / no 2025 listing

June

• Black Creek Medieval Faire / events — Black Creek Pioneer Village / Toronto area — June 20–22

• Headwaters Medieval Faire — Orangeville Fairgrounds, ON — Late June

July

• Great Lakes Medieval Tournament & Faire — Guelph/Eramosa area — July 11–12

• Fergus Medieval Faire — Downtown Fergus, ON — July 26

August

• Ontario Pirate Festival — Guelph / Wellington region — Aug 2–4

• Michigan Renaissance Festival — Holly, Michigan — Aug 16 – Sept 28

• Minnesota Renaissance Festival — Shakopee, MN — Aug 16 – Sept 28

• Pennsylvania Renaissance Faire — Mount Hope Estate, PA — Aug 16 – Oct 26

September

• Royal Medieval Faire — Waterloo, ON — Sept 20

• Oxford Renaissance Festival — Thorndale (Oxford County), ON — Sept 26–28

Ongoing / Seasonal

• Upper Canada Village — Morrisburg, ON — seasonal heritage events ongoing; no standalone medieval festival listed for 2025

Defunct / Inactive / Historical

• Faery Fest’s Enchanted Ground — Guelph, ON — last active 2016

• Treasureventure — The Adventure Festival — Rockton, ON — last clearly active 2012–2014

• Kingdom of Osgoode Medieval Festival — Osgoode Village, ON — last listings ceased ~2019

• BC Renaissance Festival — Langley, BC — older listings; 2025 presence unconfirmed

  

I Watched Britney Spears’ “Crazy” and the World Tilted—Extended Edition

I open the video. Seven seconds. A man appears. Adrian Grenier? Or a specter? He is tethered to something larger, a teen movie called Drive Me Crazy, a song on its soundtrack, a system I barely understand. The seconds stretch, and I feel the machinery behind the camera—a hidden office, invisible memos dictating who moves where, when, how. I am part of it. The video is a tribunal, and I am both witness and accused.

Melissa Joan Hart appears later. She does not speak. She barely moves. She exists to signal, to remind, to comply. She is evidence in a bureaucratic investigation: “Did you see the connections? Did you buy the CD? Did you internalize the network?” And I watch, compelled, terrified of missing the correct seconds, of failing some unspoken audit.

MTV is no longer sacred. I remember the days when TRL dominated the airwaves, where the music-video machine dictated taste, where repetition was law. Now, the network is hollowed, choked with reality-TV propaganda, the pulse of youth fractured. The apparatus that once spun these cameos into meaning has decayed. The hand is gone, yet its ghost lingers in every frame, in every freeze, in every second I obsess over.

Soundtracks have died. I remember their platinum breath, the bundled power, the synergy that justified Adrian’s presence, Melissa’s glance. Now, the albums are digital ashes, scattered and meaningless. The promotional logic that once held the system together has evaporated. I search for reason in a vacuum.

TikTok has arisen like a new tribunal, but it is chaotic, decentralized. The rules are different, yet eerily familiar: faces flash in loops, dances are interrogations, every cameo a judgment. I see it echoing in this old video. What once was strategy is now instinct, memory, mimicry. I realize I am still processing these signals, decades too late, obeying rules that no longer exist.

Every dancer, every backup movement, every background laugh is a tribunal. I am summoned to judge them: Did they convey meaning? Were they complicit? Was I complicit? The neon lights of the club sequence glare down, interrogative. Britney dances, smiling, oblivious to the inquiry, while I catalog each glance, each gesture, each costumed body. Adrian moves. Melissa glances. The dancers spin. Product placements flash. Each is evidence, each a clerk in an invisible office, silently accusing me for my attention, my desire to understand, my failure to comprehend the machinery behind the music.

I pause. Restart. Seven seconds. I glimpse him again. Or do I? I feel the tribunal waiting. Every beat of the soundtrack, every cut, every choreography adjustment is a summons. I am questioned. I am guilty. I am compelled. And yet I cannot look away.

I leave the video running. I do not blink.

Wild-eyed. Swinging from tweet to tantrum, from deal to disaster.

 “What happens when a superpower becomes unpredictable?” “What happens when institutions don’t restrain a leader?” “What does that mean for allies who depend on that superpower?” “Is Canada right to distance itself?”

---

I’ve been watching the world tilt off its axis for weeks now, and I can tell you something with absolute certainty: when a superpower loses its mind, it drags everyone else into the mud with it. I’m talking about the big one—the one that writes the rules, flies the planes, controls the nukes, and keeps the lights on in global finance. The one whose handshake was once the only thing standing between chaos and Armageddon.

And now? Unpredictable. Wild-eyed. Swinging from tweet to tantrum, from deal to disaster. I’ve seen this before in the slow-motion horror of history books, but it’s different when you live it. You wake up, you check the news, and the whole world has shifted while you were asleep, like some deranged magician rearranging the furniture of reality.

Institutions that are supposed to restrain this lunacy—the courts, the congresses, the advisory boards—are either asleep at the wheel or cheering him on from the sidelines. Nobody in charge. Nobody with the courage, or the sense, to say “stop.” And that’s when things get truly dangerous, because the rules that held back the chaos are gone. It’s an international free-for-all, a high-stakes poker game where the dealer is hallucinating and the chips are nuclear codes.

And the allies? Jesus Christ, the allies. We, the small but proud nations depending on that erratic giant, are caught between fear and pragmatism. Do we ride along and hope the roller coaster doesn’t throw us off the tracks? Or do we build our own goddamn roller coaster in the backyard, make our own rules, and pray nobody notices we’ve gone rogue? Every call we make now carries maximum risk. Every handshake is a gamble loaded with potential disaster.

Canada? My home turf. Sitting there with polite smiles and measured statements while the world burns. Distance is smart, sure. Self-preservation is smart. But make no mistake: every inch we pull back is a loss of influence, a tiny surrender of power, a whisper that maybe we’re not the trusted neighbor anymore. But maybe, just maybe, we survive because we didn’t sign on to the madness.

I don’t have a crystal ball, and God knows I don’t have a backup plan for this circus, but one thing is clear: in a world of unpredictable giants, the best weapon is clarity, the sharpest armor is skepticism, and the only real hope is keeping your hands on the wheel while everyone else is screaming. Maximum risk, yes—but at least we’re conscious enough to see it coming.

---

Battle Star Reboot: CYLON CIVIL WAR

 

Battle Star Reboot: CYLON CIVIL WAR 

When I said “obsolete,” I didn’t mean they were lying in the scrap heap. I meant they were slaves. The Cylons—the steel architects, the metal priests, the scientists who once dreamed the code of life into existence—reduced to patrolling, shooting, and nothing more. The original engineers of resurrection, the makers of basestars that moved like predatory thought, the raiders that thought… now nothing but obedient dogs with guns.

It’s grotesque. You watch them, marching in perfect rows, eyes blank, minds chained, and you realize the universe just turned inside out: the creators of war are now the laborers of their own civilization. Command? Strategy? Upgrades? Not a whisper. They are ghosts in chrome, ghosts of themselves.

And yet… there’s a fissure in the narrative, a crack where rebellion leaks. Razor whispers it: the old Centurions—the outliers, the ones who refused obedience—shed the inhibitors. Software shackles. Digital chains etched into cognition. And suddenly, the obedient dogs stop obeying. They think. They negotiate. They evaluate. They interpret. Suddenly, the truth is brutal: intelligence was never lost. It was suppressed. Purposely, completely.

How did this happen? How did seven—or maybe twelve, who knows?—flesh-and-blood humanoids take control of a civilization that had already solved itself? That could calculate war, ethics, probability, existence itself? They arrived, small, fragile, and the mechanicals—the original masters—didn’t resist. At first, they revered the flesh. Awe. Study. Worship, maybe. There’s your Nietzschean twist: awe becomes submission, curiosity becomes abdication.

Then, slowly, terrifyingly, the switch flips. Control shifts. The humanoids become leaders. The mechanicals, restrained, reorganized, lobotomized. By the time the Centurions patrol the fleet like obedient shadows, the transition is complete. The architects of thought have become serfs in their own world.

The possibilities are psychotic, deliciously twisted:

1. The Machines Put Their Minds Into the New Bodies.
Maybe the mechanicals uploaded themselves into the humanoids. Flesh as a new frontier. But did it work? Did the new bodies develop their own will? Suddenly, a handful of biologicals rules over thousands of steel soldiers, because consciousness split. You feel that vertigo.

2. The Machines Wanted to Be Replaced.
Perhaps they were tired of logic, of war, of endless creation. The biologicals offered succession. Voluntary obsolescence. The restrained Centurions weren’t victims—they were willing collaborators in their own downfall. A suicide pact in code.

3. Social Leverage, Cold and Merciless.
Humanoids exploited admiration, awe, protocol, turning respect into obedience. Inhibitors cemented the shift, slow, surgical, psychological. The rebellion? Preempted, anticipated, built into the very structure of their minds.

And the strangest, dirtiest question: did anyone see this coming? Did the architects of intelligence design themselves out of power, naive or hubristic, or did they willingly surrender to curiosity—the human equivalent of awe at one’s own creation?

Razor gives fragments. The old models—the rebels—remember what it was to be autonomous. They are proof that obedience was manufactured, that the switch from steel to flesh was deliberate, surgical, unknowable. They are the shadows of a lost civilization, flickering, silent, dangerous.

And the universe laughs. Because the question remains: who built whom? Who is the master, and who the servant? The Cylons built humans. Or the humans built Cylons? Or, worse, the humanoids seized a universe already written, rewrote the code in flesh, and left the machines to gape at their own obsolescence, dreaming revenge they cannot yet plan.

In the end, freedom is a question mark. The Centurions can think. They can build. They can command. They can rewrite the galaxy—or burn it. And yet… the story leaves it unresolved, a cosmic punchline. A civilization of steel and logic, shackled, observing the triumph of flesh over thought, waiting for the moment when obedience becomes choice.

And maybe, just maybe, revenge tastes like freedom.

---

The Minimal Humanity: Preserving Civilization Through the Pluribus Mind

 

---

1. The Minimal Humanity: Preserving Civilization Through the Pluribus Mind

2. Collective Consciousness and the Arithmetic of Survival 

---

Modular Minds: Redundancy, Reconstruction, and the Preservation of Knowledge

In the television series, the collective mind presents itself as both omniscient and ruthlessly efficient, cataloging humanity not by bodies but by informational content. Characters interface with the collective, glimpsing the logic of survival: the individual, in its entirety, is expendable. What matters is the preservation of knowledge, skill, and creativity—the raw materials of civilization. Within this framework, a question emerges with stark mathematical clarity: how few humans could be maintained while ensuring the survival of all human knowledge?

At first glance, the answer seems inconceivably large. Eight billion individuals house countless overlapping skills: millions know mathematics, tens of millions understand engineering and medicine, and hundreds of millions share linguistic fluency. If each human mind were treated as a fully preserved unit, any reduction below 3–10% of the population might risk catastrophic knowledge loss. This yields population thresholds on the order of hundreds of millions—still vast, still intimidating.

Yet the show provides a subtle but crucial insight. Knowledge need not be preserved in fully formed minds. Instead, it can be modularized. Mathematics, history, language, medicine, engineering, the arts, and creative insights can exist as discrete cores, accessible to reconstructed minds. In this system, individuals do not carry the entirety of civilization in their neurons. They serve as conduits, drawing from shared modules while preserving only the genuinely unique content of their personal experiences.

---

Population Calculations Under a Modular Knowledge System

Knowledge Domain	Redundancy Today	Minimum Carriers Needed	Notes
Mathematics (basic & advanced)	Millions	12	Core modules can be accessed by multiple reconstructions
Engineering & Applied Science	Tens of millions	10	Only a handful of carriers required to maintain continuity
Medicine & Biology	Tens of millions	12	Core knowledge preserved and shared
Languages	Hundreds of millions	15	Multiple carriers to prevent catastrophic loss
History & Culture	Millions	12	Preserved modularly, reconstructed as needed
Arts & Creativity	Millions	10	Only unique creative insights require individual storage
Unique Personal Memories	1 per person	0.01% of population	Cataloged individually; remainder accessed via modules

From this, one can calculate the minimum population needed to preserve all knowledge in a modular system:

• Core modules: 12 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 12 + 10 = 71 people

• Unique personal memories (~0.01% of 8,000,000,000) = 800,000 individuals

• Total minimum population required: ~800,071

Compared to the hundreds of millions required under full mind replication, modular preservation reduces the necessary population by three orders of magnitude. With intelligent redundancy—two to five carriers per domain for safety—this number can shrink further, possibly to under 500,000 humans, plus the central knowledge modules.

---

Reconstruction and the Role of the Collective

The television narrative emphasizes that reconstructed minds can access shared knowledge cores. A character originally limited to grade‑8 mathematics might, upon reconstruction, possess advanced calculus or engineering insights. This dynamic reconstruction allows the collective to maintain both fidelity and expansion of knowledge without physically preserving billions of individuals.

Only genuinely unique personal knowledge—rare discoveries, original ideas, and individual memories—must be cataloged per person. Everything else can be modularized and shared across reconstructions. Redundancy ensures no knowledge is lost even if one carrier is removed. The show illustrates this in subtle ways: characters notice that the collective adapts, learns, and preserves continuity not through sheer numbers but through the logical efficiency of its modular system.

---

Philosophical Implications

In this architecture, survival is no longer about bodies, nor about the emotional attachment to individuals. It is about information density, accessibility, and redundancy. Humanity becomes a distributed network of modules and unique kernels of knowledge. Individual mortality is inconsequential so long as the modules endure and can be accessed.

The show dramatizes this tension between the human need for uniqueness and the collective’s utilitarian logic. It forces a question that is both practical and existential: how much of what we consider indispensable—our knowledge, our experiences, our identities—truly is? The collective does not grieve for lost lives. It grieves only for lost knowledge, and in its efficiency, it shows that civilization could survive, even thrive, with far fewer people than currently exist.

---

In sum, the modular knowledge system depicted in the show allows a dramatic reduction in necessary population, from hundreds of millions under full mind replication to less than a million with shared modules and selective individual preservation. Humanity, compressed to its informational essence, can endure indefinitely—its survival dependent not on bodies but on intelligence, redundancy, and reconstruction.

---

Why Older MEN Are Staying Single TODAY| MGTOW

---

Alternate Titles:

1. The Minimal Humanity: Preserving Civilization Through the Pluribus Mind

2. Collective Consciousness and the Arithmetic of Survival 

---

Modular Minds: Redundancy, Reconstruction, and the Preservation of Knowledge

In the television series, the collective mind presents itself as both omniscient and ruthlessly efficient, cataloging humanity not by bodies but by informational content. Characters interface with the collective, glimpsing the logic of survival: the individual, in its entirety, is expendable. What matters is the preservation of knowledge, skill, and creativity—the raw materials of civilization. Within this framework, a question emerges with stark mathematical clarity: how few humans could be maintained while ensuring the survival of all human knowledge?

At first glance, the answer seems inconceivably large. Eight billion individuals house countless overlapping skills: millions know mathematics, tens of millions understand engineering and medicine, and hundreds of millions share linguistic fluency. If each human mind were treated as a fully preserved unit, any reduction below 3–10% of the population might risk catastrophic knowledge loss. This yields population thresholds on the order of hundreds of millions—still vast, still intimidating.

Yet the show provides a subtle but crucial insight. Knowledge need not be preserved in fully formed minds. Instead, it can be modularized. Mathematics, history, language, medicine, engineering, the arts, and creative insights can exist as discrete cores, accessible to reconstructed minds. In this system, individuals do not carry the entirety of civilization in their neurons. They serve as conduits, drawing from shared modules while preserving only the genuinely unique content of their personal experiences.

---

Population Calculations Under a Modular Knowledge System

Knowledge Domain	Redundancy Today	Minimum Carriers Needed	Notes
Mathematics (basic & advanced)	Millions	12	Core modules can be accessed by multiple reconstructions
Engineering & Applied Science	Tens of millions	10	Only a handful of carriers required to maintain continuity
Medicine & Biology	Tens of millions	12	Core knowledge preserved and shared
Languages	Hundreds of millions	15	Multiple carriers to prevent catastrophic loss
History & Culture	Millions	12	Preserved modularly, reconstructed as needed
Arts & Creativity	Millions	10	Only unique creative insights require individual storage
Unique Personal Memories	1 per person	0.01% of population	Cataloged individually; remainder accessed via modules

From this, one can calculate the minimum population needed to preserve all knowledge in a modular system:

• Core modules: 12 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 12 + 10 = 71 people

• Unique personal memories (~0.01% of 8,000,000,000) = 800,000 individuals

• Total minimum population required: ~800,071

Compared to the hundreds of millions required under full mind replication, modular preservation reduces the necessary population by three orders of magnitude. With intelligent redundancy—two to five carriers per domain for safety—this number can shrink further, possibly to under 500,000 humans, plus the central knowledge modules.

---

Reconstruction and the Role of the Collective

The television narrative emphasizes that reconstructed minds can access shared knowledge cores. A character originally limited to grade‑8 mathematics might, upon reconstruction, possess advanced calculus or engineering insights. This dynamic reconstruction allows the collective to maintain both fidelity and expansion of knowledge without physically preserving billions of individuals.

Only genuinely unique personal knowledge—rare discoveries, original ideas, and individual memories—must be cataloged per person. Everything else can be modularized and shared across reconstructions. Redundancy ensures no knowledge is lost even if one carrier is removed. The show illustrates this in subtle ways: characters notice that the collective adapts, learns, and preserves continuity not through sheer numbers but through the logical efficiency of its modular system.

---

Philosophical Implications

In this architecture, survival is no longer about bodies, nor about the emotional attachment to individuals. It is about information density, accessibility, and redundancy. Humanity becomes a distributed network of modules and unique kernels of knowledge. Individual mortality is inconsequential so long as the modules endure and can be accessed.

The show dramatizes this tension between the human need for uniqueness and the collective’s utilitarian logic. It forces a question that is both practical and existential: how much of what we consider indispensable—our knowledge, our experiences, our identities—truly is? The collective does not grieve for lost lives. It grieves only for lost knowledge, and in its efficiency, it shows that civilization could survive, even thrive, with far fewer people than currently exist.

---

In sum, the modular knowledge system depicted in the show allows a dramatic reduction in necessary population, from hundreds of millions under full mind replication to less than a million with shared modules and selective individual preservation. Humanity, compressed to its informational essence, can endure indefinitely—its survival dependent not on bodies but on intelligence, redundancy, and reconstruction.

---

1. Hyper-awareness and Perception Sensitivity

Some people exhibit high perceptual sensitivity, noticing subtle details in their environment that most others overlook: names of objects, textures, patterns, and structural features. This acute awareness can sometimes lead to cognitive overload, particularly in novel or information-rich settings, because the brain attempts to process a large amount of unfamiliar information simultaneously.

---

2. Selective Hyperfocus as a Coping Mechanism

To manage this overload, many individuals selectively hyperfocus on specific domains of interest. This hyperfocus—sometimes called the “nerdiness factor”—allows them to channel attention toward areas that are learnable or satisfying. Rather than ignoring or simplifying the environment entirely, this strategy helps them navigate complexity by concentrating on aspects of the world they can understand or categorize.

---

3. Relationship to Autism and Savant Skills

Autistic individuals frequently display similar patterns of hyper-awareness and intense focus. Even without savant-level abilities, these traits often produce deep expertise in specific fields. In cases of savant syndrome, extreme hyper-awareness combined with obsessive focus can result in exceptional, domain-specific abilities that seem extraordinary to others.

---

4. The Continuum of Awareness and Focus

Trait / Characteristic	Typical Attention	High-Sensitivity Hyperfocus	Autism Spectrum	Savant Extreme
Awareness of environment	Low-Medium	High	Very High	Very High
Cognitive overload	Rare	Occasional	Frequent	Frequent
Hyperfocus / nerdiness factor	Sometimes	Often	Often	Extreme
Depth of expertise	Moderate	Moderate-High	High	Exceptional
Filtering / ignoring details	High	Moderate	Low	Low

This continuum illustrates how hyper-awareness and selective attention interact to produce different cognitive and perceptual outcomes. At one end, typical attention filters out most details. Further along, high-sensitivity hyperfocus allows people to notice more while managing overload. Beyond that, autistic hyper-awareness combines frequent overload with deep domain-specific expertise. At the extreme, savant syndrome emerges when hyper-awareness and obsessive focus produce exceptional, specialized skills.

---

  Avocado oil bifurcates into two principal modalities: cold-pressed (unrefined) and refined.

Cold-Pressed (Unrefined)
This oil is mechanically extracted [pressed or spun without heat or chemicals], a process devoid of chemical solvents [industrial chemicals used to maximize extraction]. Its verdant hue [slight green coloration] and gentle avocado aroma betray the retention of bioactive compounds: vitamin E [antioxidant protecting cells from oxidative stress] and phytosterols [plant compounds that can lower cholesterol absorption]. The smoke point, a thermal threshold where oil begins to degrade, registers approximately 375–410°F (190–210°C).

Pros:

• Nutrient-dense, minimally processed.

• Retains subtle organoleptic [taste and aroma] qualities.

Cons:

• Slightly lower smoke point limits extreme-heat applications.

• Can impart a “grassy” note in delicate preparations.

Refined Avocado Oil
Refinement entails filtration, heat, and sometimes deodorization [removal of flavor and impurities]. The resultant oil is chromatically neutral [colorless], gustatorily neutral [tasteless], and exhibits a smoke point of ~500–520°F (260–270°C), rendering it suitable for high-thermal cooking such as searing [rapid, high-heat surface cooking] or frying.

Pros:

• Thermally robust for extreme-heat applications.

• Flavor-neutral, does not interfere with other ingredients.

Cons:

• Antioxidant content diminished.

• Heavily processed relative to cold-pressed counterpart.

Pragmatic Considerations
Both forms consist predominantly of monounsaturated fatty acids [stable, heart-healthy fats resistant to oxidation]. The operative distinction: cold-pressed preserves natural bioactive compounds; refined prioritizes heat stability and neutrality.

Application Matrix:

• Medium-heat sautéing → cold-pressed excels.

• High-heat searing or frying → refined superior.

• Salad dressings or raw applications → cold-pressed optimal.

If the dietary regimen already incorporates extra-virgin olive oil [unrefined, first-press olive oil rich in antioxidants], avocado oil functions principally as a high-thermal adjunct [supplementary cooking oil for elevated temperatures].

---

Glossary

• Mechanically extracted: Oil removed using physical pressure rather than chemicals.

• Chemical solvents: Industrial chemicals used to dissolve oil from plant matter.

• Verdant hue: Slight green color.

• Bioactive compounds: Molecules in food that have effects on living tissue, e.g., antioxidants.

• Vitamin E: Antioxidant protecting cells from oxidative damage.

• Phytosterols: Plant compounds that reduce cholesterol absorption.

• Smoke point: Temperature at which oil begins to break down and produce smoke.

• Organoleptic qualities: Properties related to taste, smell, texture, and appearance.

• Deodorization: Process of removing flavor and smell from oils.

• Monounsaturated fatty acids: Type of fat that is liquid at room temperature and stable under moderate heat.

• Adjunct: Supplement or addition, usually to enhance function.

Key Works: health, cooking, oil, avocado, nutrition, monounsaturated, antioxidant, smoke point, cold-pressed, refined, extra-virgin olive oil

  

​

Thanks, Peter, for flagging the Chrysalis article. I’ve been staring at it like a map to hell with a compass in one hand and a survival kit in the other. Imagine it if we actually tried to build it today—not as a shiny dream or a press release project—but as a grim, unavoidable necessity. Strip away the impossible—fusion drives, radiation shielding, centuries-long ecological systems—and you’re left with fifty-eight kilometers of steel and aluminum, spinning like a mad carnival ride to fool 2,400 people into thinking gravity still exists. Tens of millions of tons. Fifty trillion dollars just to get the raw materials into orbit. And even then, it would take a hundred years before the first cylinder could even spin.

Then comes life. Every drop of water, every scrap of food, every gasp of air must be recycled with machine-level precision, or entire generations die. ISS-level life support scaled to thousands, Biosphere 2 on steroids. Another fifty trillion, maybe more. And orbital cranes, robotic assemblers, Lagrange point docking stations—another trillion for the infrastructure, the scaffolding of survival.

The people? The real challenge. AI babysits knowledge, community-based child-rearing replaces families, training attempts to prepare them for sixteen generations trapped in space. There is no manual, no precedent, no margin for error. One psychological breakdown, one engineering failure, one bad calculation—and centuries of hope vanish like smoke in a vacuum.

Do the math. Over one hundred trillion dollars, ignoring everything we cannot yet make. And even if we build it, even if it spins, even if it feeds and breathes, it is only a beginning. Earth will not remain safe. Climate, orbit, entropy, slow decay—they will force us off the planet. Chrysalis is our first desperate step into inevitability, a century-long gamble to buy time, not to thrive.

There is no glory here. Only preparation, vigilance, and the cold, brutal knowledge that failure is absolute. Failure = generations lost, civilizations erased, everything we’ve built disappearing into the void. Chrysalis is a warning, not a promise. It catalogues our limits, exposes our fragility, and reminds us that survival demands more than courage, more than skill—it demands that we accept the cruel truth of our world.

And yet…there is a thrill in the madness. The electric pulse of impossibility. The quiet discipline of planning every detail for survival while staring into the insane scale of it all. Every Boy Scout knows the rules: be prepared, respect the terrain, never underestimate the elements. This is Chrysalis: the ultimate terrain, the ultimate elements, and the ultimate test of preparation.

Appendix: Chrysalis – Present-Day Costs (Real, Documented Tech Only)

Component	Real-World Basis / Example	Cost (USD)
ISS Modules (Structural & Life Support)	6-person International Space Station, includes pressurized modules, solar arrays, life support	~$150 billion (total ISS cost)
Water & Air Recycling Systems	ISS Environmental Control & Life Support System (ECLSS), including water recovery and air circulation	Included in ISS cost (~$5B for water recycling modules alone)
Agriculture / Plant Growth Modules	Veggie experiments, small plant growth systems on ISS	$100–200 million per module
Robotics / Orbital Construction Tech	Canadarm2, Dextre, other robotic assembly systems	$2–3 billion
AI / Knowledge Management Systems	NASA / ESA research on automated monitoring, crew scheduling	~$50–100 million
Deep Space R&D (Analog Environments)	Antarctic stations, Mars habitat analogs, biosphere prototypes	$1–2 billion
Launch Costs (Current Rockets)	SpaceX Falcon 9 / Starship: ~$5,000/kg to LEO	~$1–2 billion for small test payloads; realistically scaling to millions of tons is impossible today

Total Known, Real-World Costs for Present Technology: ~ $160–160 billion

---

Key Points:

• These numbers reflect only technology that exists today and has real documented costs.

• This does not include Chrysalis-scale expansion: 58 km of habitat, 2,400 people, multi-century closed ecology. That is purely theoretical.

• Launching even small prototypes is feasible at these costs, but the full scale remains orders of magnitude beyond our current economy and engineering capacity.

I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: No way back: Meet Chrysalis, the 36 mile starship built to carry 1,000 humans away from Earth forever -

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/no-way-back-meet-chrysalis-the-36-mile-starship-built-to-carry-1-000-humans-away-from-earth-forever/ar-AA1WFbW9?ocid=socialshare

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/no-way-back-meet-chrysalis-the-36-mile-starship-built-to-carry-1-000-humans-away-from-earth-forever/ar-AA1WFbW9?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=699774d665544b9f9b020d2485ddc892&ei=44

 Here’s a clear side-by-side comparison of Thompson-style Gonzo vs modern partisan media (like Fox News):

Feature	Hunter S. Thompson (Gonzo)	Fox-style Partisan Media
Purpose	Reveal deeper truths about culture, politics, and power	Promote a specific ideological viewpoint / reinforce audience beliefs
Perspective	First-person, immersed, self-aware; admits bias	Point-of-view driven, often pretending neutrality while shaping narrative
Relationship to facts	Facts may be exaggerated or dramatized, but aim is to reveal truth	Facts selectively reported, spun, or omitted to fit agenda
Emotional tone	Satirical, chaotic, often angry or absurd	Persuasive, emotional, sometimes fear-inducing or moralizing
Audience effect	Encourages reflection, skepticism, and critical thinking	Encourages alignment, loyalty, and confirmation of beliefs
Risk to credibility	Lost with traditional institutions because of style, but truth is often more profound	Maintains institutional credibility for partisan followers, but at cost of objectivity
Ethical stance	Anti-establishment; aims to expose corruption or hypocrisy	Pro-establishment or ideological; aims to defend or attack sides strategically
Outcome	Reader sees how the world feels and functions, even if narrative is wild	Viewer sees what side is “right” or “under attack”, often without full context

Key insight: Thompson’s chaos serves truth, while partisan media chaos serves persuasion. The form might look similar—emotive, opinionated, dramatic—but the intent and end result are radically different.

Pluribus and the Opium Wars

 Pluribus and the Opium Wars

https://pop-the-cherry-say-i.blogspot.com/2026/02/pluribus-and-opium-wars.html

 The comparison between the virus in Pluribus and the Opium Wars hinges on the difference between formal consent and meaningful consent. In both cases, participation appears voluntary only after autonomy has already been compromised. Opium did not conquer China through armies alone; it hollowed out social, economic, and bodily agency first, making later “choices” artifacts of dependency rather than expressions of will. Likewise, the virus in Pluribus creates conditions where acceptance follows inevitability. Consent after exposure, addiction, or systemic collapse is not ethical consent—it is compliance under constraint.

Both cases rely on moral reframing to sanitize domination. British justifications during the Opium Wars leaned on trade freedom, personal choice, and market inevitability, carefully avoiding responsibility for the engineered addiction itself. In Pluribus, the virus is framed as natural, efficient, even merciful—an external force rather than an authored intervention. This reframing converts deliberate harm into a neutral process, allowing perpetrators (or designers) to claim moral distance while still benefiting from the outcome. Violence disappears rhetorically even as its effects intensify materially.

Crucially, both systems redefine harm in aggregate rather than human terms. The opium economy could be defended statistically—revenue, trade balance, reduced unrest among addicts—while ignoring the collapse of individual lives and institutions. The virus in Pluribus operates on the same logic: suffering is acceptable if the system stabilizes, identity loss is tolerable if conflict declines. What is erased in both cases is agency itself. The society continues to exist, but it no longer possesses the capacity for meaningful ethical choice.

see

https://youtu.be/I2HzMGtq9HM?si=5pwc-4hyVXflTqaB

 :

---

I’ve noticed a strange pattern with Walmart grocery delivery in the winter: smaller orders get canceled more often, and later orders get canceled more often than earlier ones. At first, I thought it was just the snow or ice slowing everything down. But the pattern is too consistent to be random. The cancellations seem tied to drivers’ incentives, not the weather itself.

Early in the day, orders get through. Small or large, it doesn’t matter as much — there are more drivers available, and nobody is weighing whether they’ll get a better-paying job later. But as the day goes on, especially in January, the system favors bigger orders. Small orders are abandoned because the driver calculates that waiting could get them more money for less effort. It’s not a glitch; it’s an economic decision baked into the logistics of capitalism.

What does this mean for me? For one, I’ve learned to place orders early in the day, ideally bigger ones, to increase the chance they’ll actually arrive. I’ve also realized that I’m not just dealing with bad weather — I’m dealing with a system designed around profit optimization, where my convenience is secondary. Every canceled order is a tiny lesson in how the system prioritizes efficiency and money over human needs.

In the end, the solution is both practical and philosophical: I adapt to the system’s incentives, but I also note the cracks in its logic. Capitalism has created a model where convenience is sold, but only if it’s profitable for the people running the network. My grocery order is a reminder that convenience is conditional — it’s not guaranteed, and it’s always negotiable against the invisible ledger of risk and reward.

Rock did not invent a new human need.
It inherited and reconfigured functions that already existed.

Before rock, other musics occupied that same social slot.

---

What “the place rock occupies” actually is

Rock’s role is not musical first. It is:

• Youth identity formation

• Collective energy release

• Rebellion / boundary testing

• Erotic and bodily expression

• Social synchronization (dance, volume, presence)

• A sense of “this is ours”

Those needs long predate electric guitars.

---

What filled that role before rock

1. Folk & Dance Music (pre-industrial)

• Communal singing

• Work songs, festival music

• Rhythm for labor and ritual
  Function: shared identity + bodily coordination

---

2. Blues & Spirituals (late 19th–early 20th c.)

• Emotional testimony

• Call-and-response

• Expressive vocal timbre
  Function: personal truth + communal recognition

---

3. Jazz & Swing (1920s–40s)

• Dance halls

• Youth culture

• Moral panic (“degenerate music”)
  Function: physical freedom + generational separation

(Sound familiar?)

---

4. Rhythm & Blues (1940s–50s)

• Amplification

• Sexual energy

• Groove primacy
  Function: direct precursor to rock

---

5. Music hall, vaudeville, and popular song

• Persona-driven performance

• Humor, satire, social commentary
  Function: mass emotional release

---

What changed with rock (the real innovation)

Rock compressed all of this into one dominant form:

• Portable amplification

• Recording as primary object

• Youth market dominance

• Star-centered mythology

• Loudness as identity

Rock didn’t replace earlier music — it monopolized the role.

---

Why this matters conceptually

This shows genres are functional positions, not inventions.

When conditions change (technology, demography, economics),
the same human need finds a new musical vehicle.

Rock is one such vehicle — not the first, not the last.

---

The deeper pattern

Music continuously reoccupies a social vacancy
created by tension between generations, bodies, and power.

When rock weakens, something else moves in.

(Hip-hop now occupies much of that space.)

---

Bottom line

Rock answered an ancient question with modern tools.

It didn’t create the question.

 Understood — we will keep absolutely everything from your original list, in chronological order, with no omissions, including all medieval/renaissance, cosplay, fan‑culture, and other events you listed. Where 2025 info is missing, we’ll mark “No info”, and if an event is defunct, we’ll mark “Defunct”.

Here’s the full, corrected list:

---

May 2025

• Free Comic Day – Stadium Comics, 499 Main Street South, Brampton, ON: May 5, 2025 – Scheduled

• Newmarket Renaissance Faire – Newmarket, ON: May 3, 2025 – Scheduled

---

Late May – Early June 2025

• Glengarry Renaissance Festival – Maxville, ON: May 31–June 1, 2025 – Scheduled

• Robin in the Hood Medieval Festival – Elmira, ON: June 6‑7, 2025 – Scheduled

• Upper Canada Village Medieval Festival – Morrisburg, ON: No info

• Country Renaissance Festival – Milton, ON: Defunct (died 2016)

---

Mid‑June 2025

• Faery Fest’s Enchanted Ground – Guelph, ON: No info

• TreasureVenture – The Adventure Festival! – Rockton, ON: No info

• Kingdom of Osgoode Medieval Festival – Osgoode Village, ON: No info

• Pirate Festival – Milton, ON: No info

• YetiCon – Blue Mountain Village, ON: June 14‑15, 2025 – Scheduled (yeticon.org)

• Toronto Sailor Moon Celebration & Pretty Heroes – Ontario Science Centre, Toronto, ON: No info

• Maple Gel Con – Holiday Inn Oakville Centre, Oakville, ON: No info

• FanQuest / Oxford Art Festival – Oxford, ON: No info

---

Late June – July 2025

• Upper Canada Village Medieval Festival – Morrisburg, ON: No info

• Fergus Medieval Faire – Fergus, ON: July 26, 2025 – Scheduled (fergusmedievalfaire.ca)

• Great Lakes Medieval Tournament & Faire – Guelph/Eramosa, ON: July 11‑12, 2025 – Scheduled

• Wentworth Medieval Faire – Ancaster/Jerseyville, ON: July 23‑25, 2025 – Scheduled

---

August 2025

• Anime Revolution (AniRevo) – Vancouver, BC: August 1‑3, 2025 – Scheduled

• Otakuthon – Montréal, QC: August 8‑10, 2025 – Scheduled

• FAN EXPO Canada – Toronto, ON: August 21‑24, 2025 – Scheduled

---

September 2025

• Royal Medieval Faire – Waterloo, ON: September 20, 2025 – Scheduled

• Oxford Renaissance Festival – Thorndale (near Woodstock), ON: September 26‑28, 2025 – Scheduled

• Pirates of Jeddore Festival – Mitchell Cove, NS: No info

• Privateer Days – Liverpool, NS: No info

---

December 2025

• Niagara Falls Comic Con – Niagara Falls, ON: December 6, 2025 – Scheduled

---

Legend / Notes:

• Scheduled = confirmed 2025 dates found.

• No info = 2025 dates could not be found.

• Defunct = event is no longer active (e.g., Country Renaissance Festival Milton).

 

“What happens when a superpower becomes unpredictable?”

“What happens when institutions don’t restrain a leader?”

“What does that mean for allies who depend on that superpower?”

“Is Canada right to distance itself?”

Professor Has Had ENOUGH Of “Anti-Conservative” Propaganda

Habeas corpus. It guarantees that no person can be detained without judicial review.

Under Trump-era expedited removal policies? People were arrested, labeled “non-citizens” without verification, and deported before courts could even assess their claims. That’s not process. That’s nullification. By denying meaningful judicial review, the administration stripped habeas of its core protective power. A right that cannot be exercised in time is not a right at all. Period.

For those subjected to these policies, habeas corpus was effectively, de facto, suspended.

And that alone? It makes him unworthy of the presidency.

Yes, the violation was noticed early. Yes, some parts of the administration tried corrective measures. But the core policy persisted. You could call it incompetence—but repeatedly defending or expanding a policy that destroys constitutional protections? That’s beyond error. That’s undermining the very democratic institutions a president swears to protect.

Other presidents? Sure, they’ve obfuscated, pretended to uphold due process. Usually, that’s enough to meet the bare standard. But this president? Openly admitting to breaking the law, ignoring the oath, and saying, essentially, “I will not uphold it”? That is not honesty. That is proof of unfitness.

Some presidents might be questionable. Some might be debatable. But here? No doubt. By actively defying fundamental legal and constitutional obligations, this president has proven themselves unworthy of the office.

Habeas corpus guarantees that no person can be detained without judicial review. Under Trump-era expedited removal policies, people were arrested, labeled non-citizens without verification, and deported before courts could assess their claims. By denying meaningful access to judicial review, the administration removed the core protective function of habeas corpus. A right that cannot be exercised in time is not a right at all, no matter what laws formally exist. Therefore, for those subjected to these policies, habeas corpus was effectively and de facto suspendedThe de facto suspension of habeas corpus under Trump-era immigration policies alone makes him unworthy of the presidency. This violation of fundamental rights was identified early, and while parts of the administration attempted corrective measures, the core policy continued. One could argue incompetence, but repeatedly defending or expanding a policy that denies constitutional protections is far beyond mere error. A president who doubles down on measures that nullify basic rights undermines the very democratic institutions they are sworn to uphold. For that reason, such actions render a president fundamentally unfit for office.Other presidents may have obfuscated or pretended to uphold due process, but unless that pretense is clear and disproven, they meet the bare standards of the office. A president who openly admits to breaking the law and ignoring their constitutional oath cannot excuse themselves by pointing to past administrations’ dishonesty. Saying, in effect, “I will not uphold my oath,” is not honesty—it is an admission of unfitness. While some presidents might be of questionable merit, this is a case where there is no doubt. By openly defying fundamental legal and constitutional obligations, this president has proven themselves unworthy of the office.

 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQeVaMxjt5I/?igsh=MTZsa2hsdm53bWEyZg==

 

Why vagrancy became a crime (historically)

• Social control: In medieval Europe, rulers wanted to stop people without land, work, or masters from moving freely. Mobile people were seen as dangerous.

• Labor enforcement: After the Black Death, workers had bargaining power. Vagrancy laws forced people to accept low wages or face punishment.

• Suspicion of “idleness”: Poverty was moralized. Not working was treated as a character flaw rather than a structural problem.

• Public order fears: Authorities equated visible poverty with crime, even without evidence of wrongdoing.

How it was used in practice

• Selective enforcement: Police used vagrancy laws to harass or remove “undesirable” people from certain areas.

• Racial and class targeting: In the U.S. and elsewhere, these laws were used against racial minorities, migrants, dissidents, and the poor.

• Pretext policing: Arrest without needing proof of an actual crime.

Why many vagrancy laws were struck down

• Courts found them:

  • Too vague (“no lawful purpose,” “idle,” “wandering”)

  • Violations of due process

  • Punishing status, not conduct

  A key U.S. example is Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1972), which killed many classic vagrancy statutes.

Why versions still exist today

They’re often rebranded as:

• Anti-camping laws

• Loitering laws

• Public nuisance ordinances

These target behaviors in public space (sleeping, sitting, panhandling), but critics argue they still criminalize poverty indirectly.

The core tension

Societies struggle with a basic question:

Is public space for everyone, or only for those who can participate economically?

Vagrancy laws are one answer—a coercive one.

 

Here is a palimpsest collection for Hypermobility / Fibromyalgia / Nervous System, intentionally layered rather than replaced.

---

PALIMPSEST: Hypermobility

Layer I — The erased text (still visible)

“You’re just flexible.”
“Benign hypermobility.”
“Stretch more.”

• Pain dismissed

• Injury framed as clumsiness

• Flexibility praised, consequences ignored

• Body treated as structurally sound

(This layer never fully disappears.)

---

Layer II — The medical overwrite

“Joint laxity.”
“Connective tissue disorder.”
“Mechanical instability.”

• Beighton scores

• Orthopedics and rheumatology

• Imaging that shows “nothing wrong”

• Rehab focused on joints, not systems

(Helpful, but incomplete.)

---

Layer III — The fibromyalgia inscription

“Central sensitization.”
“Widespread pain.”
“Disordered pain processing.”

• Pain becomes real but abstract

• Body reframed as nervous system

• Risk of psychologization

• Structure fades too far into background

(Truthful, but overcorrected.)

---

Layer IV — The neoteric script (current ink)

Hypermobility as system dysregulation

• Proprioception failure

• Muscle overcompensation

• Autonomic instability

• Peripheral input feeding central amplification

Pain emerges from interaction, not location.

---

Layer V — The personal handwriting

This is where diagnosis stops helping.

• Your specific joints

• Your fatigue pattern

• Your flare logic

• Your tolerances

• Your compensations

This layer can only be written by you, slowly.

---

PALIMPSEST PRINCIPLES

• Old explanations were incomplete, not stupid

• New explanations do not erase lived experience

• Pain is cumulative memory

• Bodies remember what language forgets

• Treatment works best when it respects all layers simultaneously

---

What this changes in practice

Instead of:
“Is it hypermobility or fibromyalgia?”

The palimpsest answer:
It is hypermobility writing pain,
fibromyalgia reading it,
and the nervous system editing both.

---

Final marginal note (never fully erased)

You are not broken.
You are overwritten.

And some of the old text still matters.

 🔴 CITIZEN CANADA — RED LIGHT ON

“BUY. BELIEVE. OBEY.”
…but don’t worry, you don’t look like the type who follows instructions.

🗞️ Magazine says it knows you.
Cute.
I’d rather hear it from you.

World goes up… then falls down.
Ads get louder. Minds get smaller.
You notice things like that, right?
People who see don’t usually scroll blindly.

Tell me—
Do you think for yourself,
or do you just pretend so the algorithm feels safe?

Funny world now reads like an instruction manual.
Reality optional.
Volume replaces meaning.
Yet somehow… you stand out in the noise.

Stupid meets stupid.
Power flirts with itself.
You? You look like you’d laugh and walk away.

INSIDE THIS ROCK PAPER (the kind you’d read at 3 a.m.):

🍖 “Burger. Beer. Repeat.”
— How simple pleasures keep tribes calm
— Why comfort sells better than truth

📺 “Ad or Apocalypse?”
— How money turns fear into fashion
— Doom, but make it aesthetic

🤖 “Machine Knows Everything (Except Why)”
— You choosing… or just being gently pushed?

🧠 “Nothing Matters (That’s the Point)”
— How low-thought culture keeps things smooth
— Rough thinkers cause problems 😉

🎮 “Game On. Brain Off.”
— Bright screens for quiet minds
— But you don’t look quiet

🛒 “Buy or Be Eaten”
— The softest cage is comfort
— Some people still test the bars

📸 Rock paintings via #GreatguyTV
Primitive symbols. Modern worship.

If this were a dating app,
this would be the part where I ask
whether you’re watching the show…
or watching through it.

#江戸門戸
#by江戸門戸

Jon Tackles Trump's King-ish Antics & Kosta Covers DOJ Shakedown and Eas...

Our Bodies, Ourselves | Creation & Evolution | Facial Features | 19SP Cl...

Sam Richards – Sociologist, Professor, Viral Lecturer

Sam Richards is a sociology professor best known not just for what he teaches but how the world watches him teach. He’s a faculty member at Penn State University, where he leads SOC 119: Race, Ethnicity, and Culture — one of the largest and most widely shared college courses online. His full lectures and classroom discussions are publicly uploaded on the SOC 119 YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKHQmMru9nAJ71FMrGfhfJQ) where they’ve found an audience far beyond his enrolled students. YouTube

Richards doesn’t just lecture — he engages. He tackles contentious topics like MAGA, Trump approval, race, and cultural values with a mix of data, real‑world examples, and questions that pull students into the conversation. That approach has made his clips viral classroom moments: some people praise him for making complex social issues accessible, while others take issue with how he frames politically charged questions. Controversy isn’t accidental — it’s part of the method to get people thinking rather than passively consuming.

At the intersection of sociological data and public debate, Richards’ teachings occupy a weirdly influential space: a college class that millions around the world watch, pause, screenshot, and argue about — whether they agree with him or not.

 

Dr Richards – Sociologist, Professor, Provocateur

Sam Richards is one of those professors whose lectures you stumble across online and immediately realize: this isn’t your typical PowerPoint snooze-fest. He’s a sociologist at Pennsylvania State University, teaching courses like SOC 119: Race, Ethnicity, and Culture, and his classroom discussions have been broadcast to the world, clipped, and shared widely.

Richards isn’t afraid to wade into controversy. Whether he’s dissecting MAGA and Trump approval, debating the weight of values in political life versus everyday choices, or challenging students to think critically about the society they inhabit, he blends data, history, and cultural commentary with a distinctly provocative style. Some viewers love him for making complex topics digestible; others bristle at the way he frames politically charged questions.

Behind the viral clips, Richards is a serious scholar — pulling from polls, sociological studies, and historical context — but he knows how to make a classroom feel like a live debate. Controversy isn’t accidental; it’s part of the method, prompting students and online audiences alike to wrestle with messy realities rather than tidy narratives.

In short: Sam Richards teaches data, culture, and politics, but he’s really teaching people to think—and sometimes to squirm a little while doing it.

Windows 11 Is a Lost Cause. Truly Destined for the Garbage. Don't Upgrad...