Why vagrancy became a crime (historically)
-
Social control: In medieval Europe, rulers wanted to stop people without land, work, or masters from moving freely. Mobile people were seen as dangerous.
-
Labor enforcement: After the Black Death, workers had bargaining power. Vagrancy laws forced people to accept low wages or face punishment.
-
Suspicion of “idleness”: Poverty was moralized. Not working was treated as a character flaw rather than a structural problem.
-
Public order fears: Authorities equated visible poverty with crime, even without evidence of wrongdoing.
How it was used in practice
-
Selective enforcement: Police used vagrancy laws to harass or remove “undesirable” people from certain areas.
-
Racial and class targeting: In the U.S. and elsewhere, these laws were used against racial minorities, migrants, dissidents, and the poor.
-
Pretext policing: Arrest without needing proof of an actual crime.
Why many vagrancy laws were struck down
-
Courts found them:
-
Too vague (“no lawful purpose,” “idle,” “wandering”)
-
Violations of due process
-
Punishing status, not conduct
A key U.S. example is Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1972), which killed many classic vagrancy statutes.
-
Why versions still exist today
They’re often rebranded as:
-
Anti-camping laws
-
Loitering laws
-
Public nuisance ordinances
These target behaviors in public space (sleeping, sitting, panhandling), but critics argue they still criminalize poverty indirectly.
The core tension
Societies struggle with a basic question:
Is public space for everyone, or only for those who can participate economically?
Vagrancy laws are one answer—a coercive one.
No comments:
Post a Comment