Understood — we will keep absolutely everything from your original list, in chronological order, with no omissions, including all medieval/renaissance, cosplay, fan‑culture, and other events you listed. Where 2025 info is missing, we’ll mark “No info”, and if an event is defunct, we’ll mark “Defunct”.
Here’s the full, corrected list:
May 2025
Free Comic Day – Stadium Comics, 499 Main Street South, Brampton, ON: May 5, 2025 – Scheduled
Newmarket Renaissance Faire – Newmarket, ON: May 3, 2025 – Scheduled
Late May – Early June 2025
Glengarry Renaissance Festival – Maxville, ON: May 31–June 1, 2025 – Scheduled
Robin in the Hood Medieval Festival – Elmira, ON: June 6‑7, 2025 – Scheduled
Upper Canada Village Medieval Festival – Morrisburg, ON: No info
Country Renaissance Festival – Milton, ON: Defunct (died 2016)
Mid‑June 2025
Faery Fest’s Enchanted Ground – Guelph, ON: No info
TreasureVenture – The Adventure Festival! – Rockton, ON: No info
Kingdom of Osgoode Medieval Festival – Osgoode Village, ON: No info
Pirate Festival – Milton, ON: No info
YetiCon – Blue Mountain Village, ON: June 14‑15, 2025 – Scheduled (yeticon.org)
Toronto Sailor Moon Celebration & Pretty Heroes – Ontario Science Centre, Toronto, ON: No info
Maple Gel Con – Holiday Inn Oakville Centre, Oakville, ON: No info
FanQuest / Oxford Art Festival – Oxford, ON: No info
Late June – July 2025
Upper Canada Village Medieval Festival – Morrisburg, ON: No info
Habeas corpus. It guarantees that no person can be detained without judicial review.
Under Trump-era expedited removal policies? People were arrested, labeled “non-citizens” without verification, and deported before courts could even assess their claims. That’s not process. That’s nullification. By denying meaningful judicial review, the administration stripped habeas of its core protective power. A right that cannot be exercised in time is not a right at all. Period.
For those subjected to these policies, habeas corpus was effectively, de facto, suspended.
And that alone? It makes him unworthy of the presidency.
Yes, the violation was noticed early. Yes, some parts of the administration tried corrective measures. But the core policy persisted. You could call it incompetence—but repeatedly defending or expanding a policy that destroys constitutional protections? That’s beyond error. That’s undermining the very democratic institutions a president swears to protect.
Other presidents? Sure, they’ve obfuscated, pretended to uphold due process. Usually, that’s enough to meet the bare standard. But this president? Openly admitting to breaking the law, ignoring the oath, and saying, essentially, “I will not uphold it”? That is not honesty. That is proof of unfitness.
Some presidents might be questionable. Some might be debatable. But here? No doubt. By actively defying fundamental legal and constitutional obligations, this president has proven themselves unworthy of the office.
Habeas corpus guarantees that no person can be detained without judicial review. Under Trump-era expedited removal policies, people were arrested, labeled non-citizens without verification, and deported before courts could assess their claims. By denying meaningful access to judicial review, the administration removed the core protective function of habeas corpus. A right that cannot be exercised in time is not a right at all, no matter what laws formally exist. Therefore, for those subjected to these policies, habeas corpus was effectively and de facto suspendedThe de facto suspension of habeas corpus under Trump-era immigration policies alone makes him unworthy of the presidency. This violation of fundamental rights was identified early, and while parts of the administration attempted corrective measures, the core policy continued. One could argue incompetence, but repeatedly defending or expanding a policy that denies constitutional protections is far beyond mere error. A president who doubles down on measures that nullify basic rights undermines the very democratic institutions they are sworn to uphold. For that reason, such actions render a president fundamentally unfit for office.Other presidents may have obfuscated or pretended to uphold due process, but unless that pretense is clear and disproven, they meet the bare standards of the office. A president who openly admits to breaking the law and ignoring their constitutional oath cannot excuse themselves by pointing to past administrations’ dishonesty. Saying, in effect, “I will not uphold my oath,” is not honesty—it is an admission of unfitness. While some presidents might be of questionable merit, this is a case where there is no doubt. By openly defying fundamental legal and constitutional obligations, this president has proven themselves unworthy of the office.
Social control: In medieval Europe, rulers wanted to stop people without land, work, or masters from moving freely. Mobile people were seen as dangerous.
Labor enforcement: After the Black Death, workers had bargaining power. Vagrancy laws forced people to accept low wages or face punishment.
Suspicion of “idleness”: Poverty was moralized. Not working was treated as a character flaw rather than a structural problem.
Public order fears: Authorities equated visible poverty with crime, even without evidence of wrongdoing.
How it was used in practice
Selective enforcement: Police used vagrancy laws to harass or remove “undesirable” people from certain areas.
Racial and class targeting: In the U.S. and elsewhere, these laws were used against racial minorities, migrants, dissidents, and the poor.
Pretext policing: Arrest without needing proof of an actual crime.
Why many vagrancy laws were struck down
Courts found them:
Too vague (“no lawful purpose,” “idle,” “wandering”)
Violations of due process
Punishing status, not conduct
A key U.S. example is Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1972), which killed many classic vagrancy statutes.
Why versions still exist today
They’re often rebranded as:
Anti-camping laws
Loitering laws
Public nuisance ordinances
These target behaviors in public space (sleeping, sitting, panhandling), but critics argue they still criminalize poverty indirectly.
The core tension
Societies struggle with a basic question:
Is public space for everyone, or only for those who can participate economically?
Vagrancy laws are one answer—a coercive one.
Here is a palimpsest collection for Hypermobility / Fibromyalgia / Nervous System, intentionally layered rather than replaced.
PALIMPSEST: Hypermobility
Layer I — The erased text (still visible)
“You’re just flexible.” “Benign hypermobility.” “Stretch more.”
Sam Richards – Sociologist, Professor, Viral Lecturer
Sam Richards is a sociology professor best known not just for what he teaches but how the world watches him teach. He’s a faculty member at Penn State University, where he leads SOC 119: Race, Ethnicity, and Culture — one of the largest and most widely shared college courses online. His full lectures and classroom discussions are publicly uploaded on the SOC 119 YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKHQmMru9nAJ71FMrGfhfJQ) where they’ve found an audience far beyond his enrolled students. YouTube
Richards doesn’t just lecture — he engages. He tackles contentious topics like MAGA, Trump approval, race, and cultural values with a mix of data, real‑world examples, and questions that pull students into the conversation. That approach has made his clips viral classroom moments: some people praise him for making complex social issues accessible, while others take issue with how he frames politically charged questions. Controversy isn’t accidental — it’s part of the method to get people thinking rather than passively consuming.
At the intersection of sociological data and public debate, Richards’ teachings occupy a weirdly influential space: a college class that millions around the world watch, pause, screenshot, and argue about — whether they agree with him or not.
Dr Richards – Sociologist, Professor, Provocateur
Sam Richards is one of those professors whose lectures you stumble across online and immediately realize: this isn’t your typical PowerPoint snooze-fest. He’s a sociologist at Pennsylvania State University, teaching courses like SOC 119: Race, Ethnicity, and Culture, and his classroom discussions have been broadcast to the world, clipped, and shared widely.
Richards isn’t afraid to wade into controversy. Whether he’s dissecting MAGA and Trump approval, debating the weight of values in political life versus everyday choices, or challenging students to think critically about the society they inhabit, he blends data, history, and cultural commentary with a distinctly provocative style. Some viewers love him for making complex topics digestible; others bristle at the way he frames politically charged questions.
Behind the viral clips, Richards is a serious scholar — pulling from polls, sociological studies, and historical context — but he knows how to make a classroom feel like a live debate. Controversy isn’t accidental; it’s part of the method, prompting students and online audiences alike to wrestle with messy realities rather than tidy narratives.
In short: Sam Richards teaches data, culture, and politics, but he’s really teaching people to think—and sometimes to squirm a little while doing it.
Something sharp has buckled in the Hot Apollo orbit. A band built on glitter-pressure and theatrics suddenly finds its primary social feed ripped offline, right in the heat of their biggest moment. The Instagram link — once the direct beam between the band and the world — now just spits back the most fatal error: “Profile Not Available.”
This isn’t just a hiccup. This is the engine stalling while the rocket is mid-launch.
New single? Out. Video? Out. Press? Surging. Album drop? December 26, bearing down like a comet.
And now, the platform they rely on to amplify everything has evaporated. Fans fall through the floor. Press links collapse into emptiness. Visibility — the currency of modern music — drains away in real time.
Could be a glitch. Could be a hack. Could be one of those algorithmic purges where good accounts get caught in the crossfire. Regardless, the timing cuts like a blade.
Everything else — website, Bandcamp, press — still hums. But without the central channel, the entire promotional architecture tilts. A sparkle-driven band suddenly plunged into blackout.
The story so far: a rising act, a ticking clock, and a potentially career-tilting social media failure happening in the exact window where momentum matters most.
If this resolves quickly? A close-call footnote. If not? A pre-release catastrophe unfolding in slow motion.
APPENDIX A — HOT APOLLO: THE HISTORY SO FAR
• 2023 – The band refines its identity as “Toronto’s Shiniest Rock-and-Roll Band.” – Jaymes Buckman becomes the unmistakable center of gravity. – Online presence and local traction continue building.
• 2024 – Momentum grows steadily through the year. – (Aside: Cult meeting with the help of Scholz.)
• Early 2025 – New material takes shape, infused with post-Scholz confidence and artistic voltage. – Instagram solidifies as the band’s main communication hub.
• July 4, 2025 – Release of the single “We’re Hot Apollo.” – Official video drops, radiating tempest-rock style. – Multiple music sites pick up coverage immediately.
• Late 2025 – Announcement of the album Against The Odds Because We’re Gods (Dec 26). – Press, PR, and high visibility converge into the band’s most ambitious release cycle.
• Social Media Failure (Current) – Instagram link becomes inaccessible for multiple days. – Crisis strikes at peak promotional velocity. – Consequences: broken hype pipeline, lost fan conversions, fractured rollout momentum.
APPENDIX B — WHAT’S NEW WITH HOT APOLLO (RELEASES & PRESS)
🔥 Latest Single: “We’re Hot Apollo” — released July 4, 2025. – Featured in originalrock.net, Rock ’N’ Load, and others. – Carries the signature glam-strut and theatrical bravado.
🎥 New Music Video: – Dropped alongside the single. – Heavy on movement, stage-drama, and tempest-rock aesthetics. – Amplified by coverage from That Eric Alper.
🎸 Upcoming Album: Against The Odds Because We're Gods – Release date: December 26, 2025. – Backed by SelfMadeRecords / Earache Records. – Multiple PR outlets confirm the rollout and label push.
🔥 Summary of Situation: They are deep in a polished, multi-stage promotional rollout — single → video → press → album — at the exact time their core social-media hub collapses.
APPENDIX C — THE HISTORIC MEETING WITH ED SCHOLZ (SEPTEMBER 2024)
In late September 2024, Jaymes Buckman had a meeting that would quietly ripple into the band’s next era.
Ed Scholz — a quirky polymath with a knack for creating small miracles — facilitated a meeting. Through Scholz’s help, Jaymes was able to show Hot Apollo’s music to members of The Cult the band that inspired him into music.
This was not a formal endorsement or publicity stunt. It was a quiet, almost mythic encounter: a transmission of respect and recognition from established artists to an emerging force. Witnesses describe the meeting as subtle but genuine, and the experience reportedly inspired and energized the creative surge that fueled Hot Apollo’s 2025 output, including the July single and the upcoming full-length album.
A seemingly small meeting — yet one of those moments that quietly tilts the trajectory of a rising artist.
APPENDIX D — DAMAGE FORECAST & IMPACT ANALYSIS
Hot Apollo’s Instagram blackout is more than a technical hiccup — it’s a pre-release crisis. Here’s the likely fallout if it isn’t resolved quickly:
1. Visibility Loss
Press links and fan-shares hit dead ends.
New listeners drawn by the single cannot engage, lowering discovery.
Momentum evaporates in real time.
2. Fan Engagement Collapse
Followers accustomed to daily updates and Reels may disengage.
Missed opportunities for direct communication (pre-save pushes, Q&A, polls).
Social proof — likes, shares, comments — stalls or disappears.
3. Algorithmic & Platform Penalty
Broken/inactive account risks shadowing by Instagram’s feed system.
Scheduled posts, promotions, and paid campaigns misfire.
Timing-sensitive campaign fractured.
4. Reputation & Perception Risk
Fans may misinterpret outage as split, hack, or internal conflict.
Industry observers and collaborators notice instability.
Temporary blackout leaves digital scars in search engines.
5. Compound Timing Threat
Occurs during peak pre-album release cycle, damage magnified.
Each day of outage multiplies the impact exponentially.
⚡ Overall Forecast:
Short-term: minor confusion, slight engagement drop.
Prepare alternate handles or temporary accounts if recovery fails.
Schedule extra promotional pushes post-restoration.
Reassess press calendar to compensate for lost visibility.
6. Maintain Creative Output
Continue releasing teasers, behind-the-scenes clips, or exclusive content.
Keep fans engaged with visuals, performances, interactive posts.
Don’t let blackout stall the album narrative.
⚡ Key Principle: Turn the blackout into part of the story — temporary chaos heightens anticipation, reinforces Hot Apollo’s mythic persona, and amplifies the launch if handled with urgency and theatrical flair.
Monday, 1 December 2025
CITIZEN CANADA PRESENTS
🔴 “BUY, BELIEVE, OBEY: SAVE THE SCIENCE CENTRE EDITION”
November hums in fluorescent light.
Concrete corridors echo with footsteps of curious feet.
Exhibits hum with electricity, projectors beam equations onto walls, and hands reach out to touch rotating planets.
The Science Centre is alive — a cathedral of discovery in the middle of the city.
Click. Swipe. Look. Learn.
Hands-on learning is currency. Curiosity is contagious.
Interactive exhibits are sermons; workshops are rites of passage.
Even the quiet labs speak, whispering formulas into the imagination.
The silence of neglect threatens. Only advocacy hums.
Truth flickers in petitions, emails, and fundraising tabs: We cannot afford to lose this.
INSIDE THIS ISSUE:
🧧 “Civic Curiosity Under Threat”
Education outsourced to screens. Schools shrink budgets. Kids’ access limited.
Science centres act as public classrooms, hands-on labs, and exposure to careers that textbooks alone can’t teach.
When science is privatized or cut, curiosity is auctioned.
🪙 “The Economics of Wonder”
Admissions, memberships, gift shops — revenue streams barely cover operating costs.
Yet closing means losing millions of learning moments, countless future STEM careers, and community trust.
Investment isn’t charity. It’s building the next generation of scientists, engineers, and innovators.
🚀 “Exhibits as Experiments”
Planetariums, chemical demos, robotics, and immersive science shows.
Interactive, visceral, unreplicable online.
Removing these experiences reduces science to videos — sterile, flattened, unengaging.
📺 “Science as Civic Duty”
Public engagement builds informed citizens.
Understanding climate, health, and technology isn’t optional; it’s survival.
Science centres are trust anchors in an era of misinformation and algorithmic echo chambers.
🌍 “Community in Motion”
Programs for underserved neighborhoods, outreach initiatives, workshops for kids with limited access — these are social infrastructure.
Closing the doors breaks more than a building; it fractures a network of equity, education, and inspiration.
The magazine hums with fluorescent urgency.
Jagged lines. Capital/lowercase flips. Pings in the margins.
Every page a rally. Every article a beat.
Hyperpop reportage meets civic advocacy: chaotic, urgent, cinematic.
You read it, scroll it, sign petitions, share it.
And still you buy. Believe. Obey.
Attention wrapped in the shimmer of knowledge.
Routine masquerading as activism.
Screens ping. Emails fly. Servers hum.
The world keeps selling itself — and the Science Centre is worth saving.